Rationalism and
Empiricism
In our world today, they’re many
debates about were our ideas come from and the existence of them. They fall
under two ideas; Rationalism and Empiricism. Rationalism, the idea that some of
our knowledge is innate or they are born within us. Empiricism is the idea that
all knowledge we have comes from experience and none of the ideas are innate.
My opinion on this debate is that knowledge comes from experience and I agree
with the Empiricism. I believe that in order for us to fully grasp the
understanding of something we have to experience for ourselves. We can’t rely on someone’s words and what
they say in order for us to understand how something is. To back up my claim, I
can refer to Descartes wax example. In Descartes example he explained how if
one saw a piece of solid wax and had never experienced wax melting in there
life, they would not be able to know that the puddle of melted wax is the same
solid wax that we have in our hand. If I was a person who had experienced melting
wax I would know that even thought its shape and the features that made is wax
had changed its still the same wax that we had. But until we bring the person
who has never experienced melting wax to see how the wax melts once its in the
fire and creates a puddle of wax then they will understand that the wax is the
same just in a different form. It means that things can go through changes but
it will still be the same from what it first was and one can more grasp the
concept from experience then from being learned from one other person.
Explanatory Breadth: the origin of the ideas. Empiricism explains
the theory of more ideas then Rationalism because it explains more about all
the ideas then Rationalism does. It says all ideas come from experience and so that
covers all of the knowledge we know. While Rationalism fails to explain where
the knowledge comes from even though its innate, only coves some of them.
Explanatory Depth: how much detail
an argument can provide. Neither arguments really provide detail about the
knowledge we are learning but I believe Empiricism does a better job at giving
detail then Rationalism. Empiricism explains how it’s acquired through
experience and Rationalism doesn’t provide even one detail. An example on how
Empiricism explains in more detail is someone who has experienced a loss of a
person, can tell someone how there feeling but unless you have experienced a
loss of your own, you will never fully understand what the person is actually
feeling. Everyone can know what it is to lose someone but you don’t understand
it fully until you have experienced it.
Simplicity: this is how simple the
argument is and the lack of assumptions it may have. Empiricism states how all of our thoughts or
ideas originate in experience. Its ideas are less likely to be questioned then
the ideas of Rationalism. Rationalism says some ideas are innate but not
everyone’s born with the same knowledge making is more complex to understand
the type of knowledge someone may have.
Conservatism: this is how well the
ideas connect to today’s society I think that both ideas are accepted within
today’s society but Empiricism is more of a consistent belief. In today’s
world, there are many more things to experience and learn. The things that you understand are from
seeing and learning on your own. If you never knew how to walk and someone told
you it’s just by putting one foot in front of the other, you wouldn’t really
understand how to walk. Until you try it out for yourself and experience walking
on your own you wouldn’t understand. Rationalism, states that some of the ideas are
innate but with todays ideas and beliefs it wouldn’t connect with them as well
as Empiricism does.
1.
Empiricism and Rationalism are the most
plausible theories of explanation to explain origin of ideas.
2.
Empiricism has much more explanatory depth and
simplicity, while they are both pretty conservative.
3.
Therefore, Empiricism is the best explanation of
the origin of ideas
You pose a very good argument in this blog post. I do agree that Empiricism is the best explanation for the origin of ideas however, I do not agree that Empiricism has more simplicity. Rationalism, in my opinion, is a less complex idea than Empiricism. While Rationalism must only account for some of the ideas we learn throughout our life, Empiricism must apply to ALL ideas we learn. Empiricism takes into account different experiences and perceptions throughout our lifetime while rationalism focuses more on the innate ideas we have. And there are not many innate ideas that we are born with. Therefore, Rationalism is more simplistic.
ReplyDelete