The
free will debate is a dispute between one side on libertarianism and the other
side is hard determinism. Libertarianism believes that they have the ability to
control and change their actions; they have free will. However, hard
determinism focuses on the belief that human beings lack free will because our
actions come from early psychological and or physical events.
In
my opinion I believe that libertarianism is more plausible than hard
determinism. In your life, you are
forced to make your own decisions. Everything you do is done because you have
the ability to pick rather everything is predetermined for you. If everything
is predetermined for you it then you never know what you’re expecting. Overall,
I believe that everyone makes their own decisions because they want their
future to be in their hands rather relying on fate to lead them in the right
direction.
Explanatory breadth- Libertarianism
explains more about human behavior than hard determinism. For instance, the belief
of libertarianism humans are in control of what they want and it’s more direct
in what they want. It explains more about their behavior unlike hard
determinism because they believe it come from psychological or physical events,
but it’s not as sure as libertarianism.
Explanatory depth- in both theories
they explain where the causes come from. However, libertarianism does a better
job in better job explaining the cause. For libertarianism they themselves are
the cause of their behavior because they control their life and their
decisions. Where as determinism tells where the behavior comes from either
psychological or physical events, but its vague and doesn’t give an exact
answer.
Simplicity- Hard determinism is more
simplicity because all their actions are predetermined. Where as libertarianism
actions are spontaneous; they have to explain why they choice to do so.
Conservatism- In today’s society,
libertarianism is more common than hard determinism. People are more in control with their life and plan what
they want to do. Rather than follow the hard determinism belief of allowing
fate and other events to be the path you follow.
1.) Libertarianism
is more plausible explanations of free will.
2.) Libertarianism
has much more explanatory depth and conservatism, whereas hard determinism has
a little more simplicity, and Libertarianism and hard determinism have both
explanatory breadths.
3.) Therefore,
libertarianism is the best explanation of free will.
Could've done a few more things to further explain your argument. For one, you didn't include the idea of spontaneous free will which is the main argument of libertarianism. Also, you could've further dissected libertarianism and explained the fact that not only do libertarians believe in free will, their definition of free will includes overall autonomy, individual judgement/decision making, overall control of their life's path. You also mentioned the idea of fate for determinism but really it's not fate that decides life's path according to determinists, but previous psychological or physical events.
ReplyDelete-C Williams
For your explanation on why libertarianism is more plausible you state that " If everything is predetermined for you it then you never know what you’re expecting" which yes is very true but for each argument that could be true. regardless in life you gotta expect the unexpected
ReplyDelete