Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Aesthetic

There are two different types of aesthetic theories to judge artwork: Formalism and Romanticism. Formalism is the purpose of art is ideas that represent reality and guide our behavior. Romanticism is the art of expressing non-rational emotions. Romanticism emotions are more mysterious and deeper than one we normally relate to.
           
Out of the two theories, I think Romanticism is more plausible than Formalism. Romanticism has more dept to the beauty of art rather than Formalism. Romanticism looks deeper in the meaning of the art; it focuses on more of the significance behind the work. However, formalism emphases the color, shape, and texture, not the significance of the artwork.
           
Explanatory Breadth- Romanticism explains more of the artwork than Formalism. Romanticism talks about how it expresses emotion that makes us aware of deeper meaning. It talks about what the art is trying to represent.
           
Explanatory Depth- Romanticism goes into greater detail when it talks about the beauty is sublime. The beauty of Romanticism theory is overwhelming, rather than Formalism is represented figuratively or in an abstract manner.
           
Simplicity- Formalism is more simplistic than Romanticism. Romanticism goes more into depth about the work behind the art. Formalism only looks at the piece of art by the way it looks, not a deeper meaning of it.

Conservatism- Romanticism has more conservatism than Formalism. I believe that Romanticism has a more modern theory of art. When we look at art, we don’t only look at the structure of the piece, but what it has behind it. We try to figure what it’s trying to represent.

1.     Romanticism and Formalism are the most plausible explanations of art.

2.     Romanticism has much more explanatory depth, breadth, and conservatism, whereas Formalism has a little more simplicity.

3.     Therefore, Romanticism is the best explanation of art. 

2 comments:

  1. Gianna,
    I think that your argument for Romanticism is very clear and good but you should go more in depth about it. You should add examples about how is goes beyond the deeper meaning of art. I also think that you need to explain more about how formalist interpret the art that they are looking at with the concepts of background, foreground, etc. Other then that i would agree completely on your argument for romanticism and think you did a good at going further in your argument for it.
    -Em

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good definitions of both of the two types of Aesthetic Theories, i think you did a good job explaining why you believed Romanticism was more plausible but i think you could've added more into your reasoning on Conservatism. I do agree with you that Formalism has more simplicity than Romanticism.

    ReplyDelete